Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Mini with new score terms bug thread
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Virtual Boss*![]() Send message Joined: 10 May 08 Posts: 35 Credit: 713,981 RAC: 0 |
Ten that Crashed - all within a second of starting. (2 hosts each wu) wuid=185909479 wuid=185909490 wuid=186111635 wuid=186111636 wuid=186166865 wuid=186218780 wuid=186218781 wuid=186225501 wuid=186239437 wuid=186239457 |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Jul 06 Posts: 109 Credit: 1,859,263 RAC: 0 |
OK https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=186139538 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 655 Credit: 12,067,010 RAC: 2,804 ![]() |
I don't see much point in my posting the links, I have over 50 of these wu types that have failed within a second on my all of my XP machines. All of them have Intel CPU's, 2 Quad cores, 1 dual core, and one single core. My single Linux machine has not failed a wu, but it has not crunched very many. This also has an Intel, a dual core. Seems to have started 30th, am still getting them now. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Oct 05 Posts: 711 Credit: 26,694,507 RAC: 0 |
|
Tyler Send message Joined: 26 May 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 29,754 RAC: 0 |
All 6 of these that I have run on my Windows Vista Home Premium Intel Core 2 Duo machine have failed, all within a second. Oh well. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 12 Dec 06 Posts: 45 Credit: 4,428,086 RAC: 0 |
No problems here: linux, AMD Athlon XP |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1239 Credit: 14,421,737 RAC: 36 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=439347 Rochester, a quick look at some of the workunits you were given indicates that there are now some Windows XP machines that succeed with these workunits, but only if they have significantly more memory cache and perhaps also more RAM memory for the workunits to run in than your machine has. It's not clear if this will also help your plain minirosetta workunits run correctly. It's possible that the missing file problem has been corrected at least some of these workunits intended for Windows, but you seem to now be having mostly a different problem. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
having a hard time finding memory for that old machine.........memory on this one is all i can put in it https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=267483 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=439347 |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1239 Credit: 14,421,737 RAC: 36 |
having a hard time finding memory for that old machine.........memory on this one is all i can put in it https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=267483 Here's a place I've found that is good at matching memory to the machine model number: http://www.crucial.com/ Even if your motherboard can't hold any more memory, you might be able to find someone more familiar with XP who can tell you how to increase the memory cache, even if you can't increase RAM memory to match, which is likely to be enough to make the workunits run properly on your machine, although somewhat slowly. This will take a little more disk space, though. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Aug 07 Posts: 49 Credit: 1,786,248 RAC: 0 |
I have a Win XP with 2gig of RAM, tons of harddrive space, and my BOINC prefs set to use 100% of my computer's resources. I'm running 5.10.20. ALL of my "new score" WUs have crashed within .15 seconds of starting. Was having a little bit of a problem with some early RosettaMini WUs (now fixed), but that's all the problems this machine has ever had. In looking at the failed WUs on my Tasks webpage, all of my wingmen have also had failed WUs. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
it is low ..im looking for memory for that old machine..but it was running ok not that long ago System requirements for Rosetta indicate 256 MB RAM. 256 MB might not be needed for all tasks, but it seems 128 MB is a tad on the low side. |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1239 Credit: 14,421,737 RAC: 36 |
The Crucial web site I mentioned earlier led me to the place I found to buy more memory for my machine. There's a possibility that some of the changes in Rosetta@home workunits and program versions have led to a need for more memory than before. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 06 Posts: 13 Credit: 22,268 RAC: 0 |
memory usage is realy verry enormous now is it by me 290MB in ram and 500MB in VM! with minirosetta 1.40 is my computer unusable. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta Mini with new score terms bug thread
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org